基于改进(MGWR)降尺度方法的西南高原峡谷地区高分辨率栅格降水数据重建
            
                编号:723
                访问权限:仅限参会人
                更新:2024-04-16 09:30:36
                                浏览:1323次
                口头报告
            
            
            
                摘要
                High-spatiotemporal-resolution rainfall data are crucial for investigating local terrestrial water cycles. Although remote-sensing satellite precipitation products effectively reproduces spatial patterns of rainfall, it suffers from low spatial resolution. To overcome such limitations, a two-step downscaling approach is proposed here, primarily involving correction followed by downscaling. First, 80% of the meteorological-station data is utilized to calibrate the original Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) data, enhancing the correlation between GPM and station data. Subsequently, utilizing elevation, slope, aspect, NDVI, wind direction, water vapor, and land surface temperatur, as well as slope and aspect correction factors, as independent variables, multiscale geographically weighted regression (MGWR) and temporal lag MGWR (TL-MGWR) models were constructed. We selected the model with higher accuracy on a monthly basis, and thereby obtaining higher-precision rainfall data. Through the aforementioned steps, downscaled monthly and daily precipitation data for the study area in 2022 at a spatial resolution of 0.01° were obtained.
Our findings indicate that selectively employing suitable MGWR or TL-MGWR models on a monthly basis can effectively downscale monthly GPM rainfall data in the study area. A consideration of the lag effects of NDVI between April‒June and October‒December improved the downscaling performance of the MGWR model. This downscaling process preserved the spatial distribution of the original GPM while enhancing the spatial resolution and had lower MAE , RMSE values, as well as exhibited smaller biases. The downscaled (original) monthly precipitation data exhibited a correlation of 0.94 (0.768), with an MAE of 16.233 mm/month, RMSE of 27.106 mm/month, and bias of −0.043. Similar enhancement was likewise noted in daily precipitation, displaying a correlation coefficient of 0.863 (0.318) for downscaled (original) data, and a RMSE of 3.209 mm/day, MAE of 1.082 mm/day, and bias of −0.06. In summary, the data after downscaling, both for monthly and daily datasets, was markedly improved in accuracy. The proposed downscaling method is applicable for reconstructing high-resolution grid data at monthly and daily temporal scales in the complex terrain of the southwest China highland canyon area.
 
             
            
                关键词
                GPM; Downscaling; MGWR; Temporal lag; Calibration; Meteorological stations; Southwest China
             
            
            
                    稿件作者
                    
                        
                                    
                                                                                                                        
                                    王莉红
                                    西南大学
                                
                                    
                                        
                                                                            
                                    李月臣
                                    西南大学
                                
                                    
                                                                                                                        
                                    甘宇诗
                                    西南大学
                                
                                    
                                                                                                                        
                                    赵龙
                                    西南大学
                                
                                    
                                                                                                                        
                                    樊磊
                                    西南大学
                                
                                    
                                                                                                                        
                                    秦伟
                                    中国水利水电科学研究院
                                
                                    
                                                                                                                        
                                    丁琳
                                    中国水利水电科学研究院
                                
                                             
                          
    
发表评论